Armando N. Meier

About Me

Postdoc at the University of Chicago

Research interests:
Public Economics, Labor Economics, Health Economics, and Behavioral Economics

Find my CV here.

Find me on Twitter.

 

 

Research

 

Working Papers

“Emotions, Risk Attitudes, and Patience” June, 2019.
SOEPpapers 1041/2019

Previous work has shown that preferences are not always stable across time, but surprisingly little is known about the reasons for this instability. I examine whether variation in people’s emotions over time predicts changes in preferences. Using a large panel data set, I find that within-person changes in happiness, anger, and fear have substantial effects on risk attitudes and patience. Robustness checks indicate a limited role of alternative explanations. I further address potential endogeneity concerns by exploiting information about the death of a parent or child. This identification strategy confirms a large causal impact of emotions on preferences.

 

“Tobacco Sales Prohibition and Teen Smoking” March, 2019.
Reto Odermatt and Alois Stutzer
IZA Discussion Paper No. 12231

We evaluate one of the most prevalent prohibitory policies: banning the sales of tobacco to teens. We exploit the staggered introduction of sales bans across Switzerland and the European Union from 1990 to 2016. The estimates indicate a less than 1 percentage point reduction in teen smoking because of the bans. The reduction is substantially lower than the 5 percentage point reduction expected by health officials. We examine additional outcomes relevant to assessing any prohibitory policy. We find that teens circumvent the bans through peers. Moreover, they consider smokers less cool but do not think smoking is more dangerous.

 

Selected Work in Progress

“Early Release and Recidivism”
Jonathan Levav and Stephan Meier

“Medical Guidelines and Doctor Behavior”
Ziad Obermeyer, Devin Pope, and Kevin Volpp

“Emotions and Decision-making”
Douglas Bernheim, Jonathan Levav, and Florian Schneider

 

Publications

“Rain, Emotions and Voting for the Status Quo”
Lukas Schmid and Alois Stutzer
Accepted at European Economic Review

Do emotions affect the decision between change and the status quo? We exploit exogenous variation in emotions caused by rain and analyze data on more than 870,000 municipal vote outcomes in Switzerland to address this question. The empirical tests are based on administrative ballot outcomes and individual postvote survey data. We find that rain decreases the share of votes for political change. Our robustness checks suggest that changes in the composition of the electorate or changes in information acquisition do not drive this result. In addition, we provide evidence that rain might have altered the outcome of several high-stake votes. We discuss the psychological mechanism and document that rain reduces the willingness to take risks, a pattern that is consistent with the observed reduction in the support of change.

Press: The Economist, Neue Luzerner Zeitung, Watson, St. Galler Tagblatt

 

“Overstrained Citizens? The Number of Ballot Propositions and the Quality of the Decision Process in Direct Democracy”
Michael Baltensperger and Alois Stutzer
Forthcoming in European Journal of Political Economy

We study how the number of ballot propositions affects the quality of decision making in direct democracy, as reflected in citizens‘ knowledge, voting behavior, and attitudes toward democracy. Using three comprehensive data sets from Switzerland with over 3,500 propositions, we exploit variation in the number of federal and cantonal propositions. Voters know the most about the content of federal propositions when they are exclusively presented and less with a high number of concurrent cantonal propositions on the ballot. Across other outcomes we find no consistent indications that – for the observed variation in the exposure to popular votes – a high number of propositions impedes the quality of decision making in Swiss federal direct democracy. In the medium to longer term, more federal propositions on the ballot rather relate to higher perceived political influence and satisfaction with democracy.

 

“Limited Self–Control, Obesity and the Loss of Happiness”
Alois Stutzer
Health Economics 25(11), 2016.

Is obesity the consequence of an optimally chosen lifestyle or do people consume too much relative to their long-term preferences? The latter perspective accepts that people might face self-control problems when exposed to the immediate gratification from food. We exploit unique survey data for Switzerland in multinomial logit and ordered probit regressions to study (i) the covariates of obesity including indicators of self-control and (ii) the consequences of obesity on the subjective well-being of people with limited willpower. Our main finding is that obesity decreases the well-being of individuals who report having limited self-control, but not otherwise.

 

Teaching

 

Public Economics and Public Choice
BSc in Business and Economics (Teaching Assistant)

Introduction to Political Economics
BSc in Business and Economics (Teaching Assistant)

Rational Choice and Psychological Extensions
MSc in Business and Economics (Teaching Assistant)

Seminar in Markets and Public Policy
MSc in Business and Economics (Co-Teaching)

 

Contact

 

armando.meier@chicagobooth.edu